Skip to main content

Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

From: Clinical benefits and adverse effects of siwak (S. persica) use on periodontal health: a scoping review of literature

Criterion

Rationale for inclusion and exclusion

Population:

Adult

An adult is person who has reached the age of maturity or adulthood [67]. The use of siwak as an alternative oral hygiene tool among adult who are physically and mentally fit, is considered independent behaviour, compared to children. The adults wearing fixed orthodontic appliance are excluded to minimise the effects of plaque-retentive factors and ease toothbrushing [21]

Concept:

Effect of siwak on periodontal health

Method and practice of siwak

The World Health Organization (WHO) recognises siwak as an alternate oral hygiene, but more research is needed [22]. It is derived from a common plant and comes in different diameter and length, as well as having distinct characteristics from toothbrushes [3]. Thus, the method and siwak practice may differ from the toothbrush and may have favourable and/or adverse effect on oral health, particularly periodontium. According to Shah et al. [23] traditional oral hygiene practises can harm the soft and hard tissues of the mouth

Context:

Clinical benefit and adverse effect of siwak

 

Study type:

Human studies and based on original data analysis

Studies that involved human population provide original data and comprehensive evidence on the clinical effects of intervention, including siwak

Date of publication:

From 01 January 1990 to 24 June 2021

Many ancient people were known to use siwak, and the clinical benefit and adverse effect were recognised [3, 4]. Apart from the perceived oral hygiene benefit of siwak, religious beliefs are the primary reason of existing population continues to use it [6, 16]. As a result, the clinical effect of siwak should be observed and reported in academic journals between 1990 to 2021, to secure the recent and dated publication within past 30 years