Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study

Original Submission
12 Oct 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Nov 2021 Author responded Author comments - Wei Geng
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Nov 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2021 Author responded Author comments - Wei Geng
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Nov 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Dec 2021 Editorially accepted
10 Dec 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page