Table 3 Success rates of implants. Please note that 13 patients received implants with both types of placement and both types of loading were used in 16 patients
| Â | Success per implant (last recall) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Implant Quality Scale Group I (Success) | Implant Quality Scale Group II (Satisfactory survival) | Implant Quality Scale Group III (Compromised survival) | Implant Quality Scale Group IV (Failure) | Total | ||
Time of implant placement | Immediate | 98 (65.3%) in 35 patients | 4 (2.7%) in 3 patients | 0 | 11 (7.3%) in 10 patients | 113 (75.3%) |
Delayed | 34 (22.7%) in 13 patients | 1 (0.7%) in 1 patient | 1 (0.7%) in 1 patient | 1 (0.7%) in 1 patient | 37 (24.7%) | |
Total | 132 (88%) | 5 (3.3%) | 1 (0.7%) | 12 (8%) | 150 (100%) | |
Provisional loading | Immediately | 103 (68.7%) in 35 patients | 2 (1.3%) in 2 patients | 1 (0.7%) in 1 patient | 7 (4.7%) i n 6 patients | 113 (75.3%) |
Delayed | 29 (19.3%) in 23 patients | 3 (2%) in 2 patients | 0 | 5 (3.3%) in 5 patients | 37 (24.7%) | |
Total | 132 (88%) | 5 (3.3%) | 1 (0.7%) | 12 (8%) | 150 (100%) | |