Validation of the French version of COHIP-SF-19 among 12-years children in New Caledonia

BMC Oral Health

Table 6 Factorial analyses: Comparison of the adjustment measures for the three models evaluated

Models^a	p	X²/DF	RMSEA	GFI	AGFI	CFI	AIC
Model 1^b	0.001	3.751	0.07	0.892	0.861	0.724	639.134
Model 2^c	0.001	3.779	0.071	0.892	0.860	0.823	641.462
Model 3^d	0.001	2.731	0.056	0.926	0.905	0.889	488.123
Good fit	[0.05; 1]	[0; 2]	[0; 0.05]	[0.95; 1]	[0.9; 1]	[0.97; 1]	> AIC
Acceptable	[0.01; 0.05]	[2; 3]	[0.05; 0.08]	[0.9; 0.95]	[0.85; 0.9]	[0.95; 0.97]	> AIC

DF, degrees of freedom; X2, Khi2 value; p, p value; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; GFI, Goodness of Fit Index; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; AGFI, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index; AIC, Akaike Information Criterion
^aCFA: confirmatory factorial analysis
^bModel 1: CFA with the original three dimensions COHIP-SF19 model
^cModel 2: CFA with the proposed four dimensions COHIP-SF19 model
^dModel 3: CFA with a modified three dimensions model using Modification Indices
> AIC: > to Akaike Information criterion (AIC) for comparison model

ISSN: 1472-6831