Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of results from studies that analysed palatal soft tissue thickness

From: Investigation of the palatal soft tissue volume: a 3D virtual analysis for digital workflows and presurgical planning

Author

Title

Year

Measurement method and site

Mean palatal masticatory soft tissue thickness [mm] ± SD for the overall palate, the first premolar region (P1) and the second molar region (M2)

Studer et al. [15]

The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures

1997

Direct bone sounding with a periodontal probe at 18 measurement points in 31 subjects

Overall = n/a

P1 = 2.4 (± 0.6) to 3.9 (± 0.6)

M2 = 2.6 (± 0.8) to 3.5 (± 1.2)

Wara-aswapati et al. [38]

Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age

2001

Direct bone sounding with a periodontal probe in 62 subjects

Overall = 3.0 (± 0.3)

P1 = 3.1 (± 0.5)

M2 = 3.8 (± 1.2)

Barriviera et al. [23]

A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerised tomography

2009

Punctual linear measurements of palatal soft tissue in 2D coronal CBCTs from 31 subjects

Overall = n/a

P1 = 3.11

M2 = 3.15

Yilmaz et al. [24]

Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate

2015

CBCT images of 345 subjects were measured in coronal slices

Overall = n/a

P1 = 3.0 (± 0.75)

M2 = 3.7 (± 0.48)

Hormdee et al. [25]

Palatal soft tissue thickness on maxillary posterior teeth and its relation to palatal vault angle measured by cone beam computed tomography

2020

Punctual, linear analysis of soft tissue thickness on the basis of CBCT data acquired in 2D coronal sections in 56 subjects

Overall = 3.71 (± 0.65)

P1 = 3.9 (± 0.73)

M2 = 3.86 (± 1.46)

Ogawa. et al. [26]

Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in evaluation of palatal mucosa thickness

2020

Evaluations of palatal mucosa thickness in CBCT plus digital impressions in 174 subjects (after creating a conversion formula, based on direct K file measurements at 15 sites in 10 subjects)

Overall = n/a

P1 = 3.20 (± 0.78) to 4.73 (± 0.76)

M2 = 3.40 (± 1.32) to 5.74 (± 1.50)

Song et al. [27]

Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerised tomography

2008

Linear punctual measurement of palatal masticatory mucosa thickness at 24 measurement points on CT images from 100 subjects

Overall = 3.83 (± 0.58)

P1 = 3.66 (± 0.66)

M2 = 3.39 (± 1.00)

Uchida et al. [39]

Measurement in vivo of Masticatory mucosal thickness with 20 MHz B-mode ultrasonic diagnostic equipment

1989

Punctual measurements of palatal masticatory mucosa thickness with a 20-MHz B-Mode ultrasonic device in 100 edentulous patients

Overall = n/a

P1 = 4.52 (± 0.9) to 4.46 (± 0.82)

M2 = 5.62 (± 1.0) to 5.53 (± 0.91)

Müller et al. [18]

Thickness of masticatory mucosa

2000

Mucosa thickness measured in 40 subjects with a 5-MHz ultrasonic device

Overall = n/a

P1 = 2.4 (± 0.45) to 2.89 (± 0.64)

M2 = 2.44 (± 0.89) to 2.76 (± 1.15)

Schulze et al. [28]

B-mode versus A-mode ultrasonographic measurements of mucosal thickness in vivo

2002

Assessment of palatal masticatory mucosa with A-mode and B-mode, 10-MHz ultrasonographic devices in 50 subjects

Overall = 1.9 mm to 5.9 mm

(95% CI, 2.9 to 3.3; median 3.1)

P1 = n/a

M2 = n/a

Heil et al. [41]

Determination of the palatal masticatory mucosa thickness by dental MRI: a prospective study analysing age and gender effects

2018

Assessment of palatal mucosa thickness on dental MRIs, at 3 Tesla with contrast-enhanced, high-resolution 3D-sequences; 40 measurement points in 40 subjects

Overall = 3.29 (± 0.45)

P1 = 2.1 (± 0.1) to 4.5 (± 1.0)

M2 = 2.1 (± 0.1) to 4.9 (± 0.8)