Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool

Original Submission
4 Feb 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos Alberto Kenji Shimokawa
26 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Francesca Gazzani
Resubmission - Version 3
26 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Francesca Gazzani
Resubmission - Version 4
31 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos Alberto Kenji Shimokawa
4 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Francesca Gazzani
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos Alberto Kenji Shimokawa
29 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Francesca Gazzani
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
3 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Francesca Gazzani
Resubmission - Version 7
3 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
4 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos Alberto Kenji Shimokawa
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
23 Aug 2022 Editorially accepted
5 Sep 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12903-022-02407-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page