Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The accuracy of a three-dimensional face model reconstructing method based on conventional clinical two-dimensional photos

Original Submission
12 Jan 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bochun Mao
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bochun Mao
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bochun Mao
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bochun Mao
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Bochun Mao
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
7 Sep 2022 Editorially accepted
19 Sep 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12903-022-02439-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page