Skip to main content

Table 1 Excluded studies and reasons for exclusion

From: Does the addition of cone-beam CT to panoral imaging reduce inferior dental nerve injuries resulting from third molar surgery? A systematic review

Author & Year

Exclusion code

Explanation

Aravindaksha et al., 2015

ACCESS

Unable to obtain full text

Fee, Wright & Cunningham, 2016

STUDY TYPE

Commentary on Ghaeminia 2015 study [20]

Fusaro et al., 2017

STUDY TYPE

Longitudinal observational cohort study

Gencheva, 2017

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective study

Ghaeminia et al., 2009

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT

Ghaeminia et al., 2011

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT

Jhamb et al., 2009

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT

Jun et al., 2013

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective study

Lenz, 2017

LANGUAGE

Non-English, unlikely relevant

Matzen et al., 2013

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT

Matzen et al., 2019

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT

Matzen et al., 2020

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT

Mendonca et al., 2021

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective study

Neugebauer et al., 2006

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective study

Petersen et al., 2014

OUTCOME

Cost benefit analysis only

Preece, J. 1988

STUDY TYPE

Narrative review

Roeder, Wachtlin & Schulze, 2012

STUDY TYPE

Sample size calculation only

Shiratori et al., 2013

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT

Susarla & Dodson, 2007

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective case series

Tantanapornkul et al., 2007

COMPARISON

No control group, all received CBCT