Table 6 Previous studies of association between dental agenesis and delay in dental development [17, 19, 23,24,25,26,27,28]
Author | Year | Population | Sample size | Age | Dental Agenesis (amount) | Method | Delay (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rune et al. [27] | 1974 | Sweden | 91 | 7–19 | 6 | Haavikko | 1.8 (boys) 2.0 (girls) |
Odagami et al. [28] | 1995 | Japan | 1623 | 5–10 | Moorrees | NO | |
Uslenghi et al. [24] | 2006 | United Kingdom | 135 | 3–15 | 1–2 | Haavikko | 1.49 (girls) 1.53 (boys) |
Kan et al. [25] | 2010 | Australia | 230 | 5–15 | 1–4 | Demirjian | 0.9 (boys) 1.1 (girls) |
Tunç et al. [19] | 2011 | Turkey | 210 | 5–12 | 1–5 | Demirjian | 0.3 (boys) 0.3 (girls) |
Ruiz-Mealin et al. [17] | 2012 | United Kingdom | 139 | 9–17,6 | 1–6 | Demirjian | 0.84 (boys) 0.88 (girls) |
Ruiz-Mealin et al. [17] | 2012 | United Kingdom | 139 | 9–17,6 | 1–6 | Haavikko | 0.9 (boys) 0.6 (girls) |
Medina et al. [26] | 2016 | Venezuela | 188 | 5–12 | 1–2 | Nolla | NO |
Badrov et al. [23] | 2016 | Croatia | 345 | 6–15 | 1–2 | Haavikko | 0.57 (boys) 0.61 (girls) |
Present study | 2021 | Spain | 204 | 6–15 | 1–4 | Demirjian | 0.30 (boys) 0.50 (girls) |