A cross-sectional survey on knowledge and attitudes of Greek dentists regarding molar incisor hypomineralisation diagnosis and treatment

Table 7 Odds ratio (confidence intervals) for the choice of different treatment options for hypersensitivity

	Home (Toothbrushing^a Vs Additional means)			Home (Fluoridated^a Vs Desensitizing agents)			Office (Prevention^a Vs Intervention)
	OR	*95% CI*	p-value **	OR	*95% CI*	p-value **	OR	*95% CI*	p-value **
Years of experience
Up to 10 yrs	1.8	1.1–3.1	0.03	1	0.6–1.6	0.95	1	0.6–1.6	0.94
> 10 yrs	Ref			Ref			Ref
Specialisation
Yes	1.9	1.1–3.2	0.02	1.3	0.83–2.1	0.23	0.9	0.54–1.4	0.51
No	Ref			Ref			Ref
Children treated
> 10	1.8	1.1–3	0.02	1.7	1.1–2.8	0.02	0.5	0.3–0.8	0.01
≤ 10	Ref			Ref			Ref
Children with MIH-affected teeth
Yes	0.8	0.4–1.3	0.32	1.3	0.8–2.2	0.36	0.6	0.4–1.1	0.09
No	Ref			Ref			Ref

OR Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval
^aReference unit
** Pearson Chi-square test was used for all variables and bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05)

ISSN: 1472-6831