Skip to main content

Table 5 Stress distributions (MPa) at the palatal and tooth landmarks after activation of the device in the different models

From: The comparison of biomechanical effects of the conventional and bone-borne palatal expanders on late adolescence with unilateral cleft palate: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis

Positions

Type A

Type B

Cleft side

Non-cleft side

Cleft side

Non-cleft side

Medial pterygoid

Superior (C)

0.1051

0.1411

0.1446

0.4484

Inferior(D)

2.7455

5.4822

9.4765

15.1840

Lateral pterygoid

Superior (E)

0.2582

0.2964

0.8974

1.5393

Inferior(F)

2.6852

4.3364

9.3405

14.2250

Maxilla

Maxillary tuberosity(G)

0.1028

0.1692

0.2693

0.3775

Anterolateral wall(H)

0.9878

1.0757

2.1953

1.9032

Inferior orbital rim(I)

0.1794

0.1265

0.3481

0.2525

Frontal process(J)

3.4256

2.7213

8.6443

5.6707

Anterior nasal spine(K)

0.4898

0.0055

0.0131

0.0104

Nasal cavity

Superior rim (L)

1.4574

0.7521

7.4482

2.7186

Inferior rim(M)

0.3133

0.3257

1.4511

0.5243

Zygomatic bone

Frontal process (N)

0.9418

1.0504

1.7545

3.2375

Temporal process(O)

0.4555

0.6365

0.5327

1.7492

Maxillary process(P)

0.3717

0.8453

1.0741

0.6540