Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistical comparison between the boys and girls in the second group

From: Effect of orofacial myofunctional therapy along with preformed appliances on patients with mixed dentition and lip incompetence

 

Sex

T1–T2

t value

P value

Mean

SD

LS

1

–0.97

2.922

0.689

0.494

2

–1.53

2.999

SNA (°)

1

–0.11

1.988

–0.529

0.599

2

0.16

1.650

SNB (°)

1

–0.29

1.652

0.739

0.463

2

–0.60

1.443

FMA (°)

1

0.14

2.940

0.360

0.721

2

–0.12

2.297

APDI (°)

1

–1.68

2.144

1.036

0.305

2

–2.28

2.072

U1SN (°)

1

0.84

9.627

–0.615

0.541

2

2.20

5.759

IMPA (°)

1

0.48

6.917

–1.433

0.158

2

2.76

4.136

HC3 (mm)

1

–0.69

2.565

–0.930

0.357

2

0.06

3.333

HPtm (mm)

1

0.50

5.105

0.382

0.704

2

–0.05

5.269

HFH (mm)

1

–1.66

6.231

1.170

0.247

2

–3.55

5.444

HMP (mm)

1

–0.11

5.532

0.988

0.328

2

–1.42

3.835

  1. Sex: 1 boy, 2 girl
  2. SD standard deviation