Skip to main content

Table 6 Correlation between disc morphology and joint morphology in different age groups

From: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in 880 temporomandibular disorder patients of different age groups: a retrospective study

Age group

Type

Biconcave

Contracture

Llengthened

Iirregular

χ2, P

r, P

 ≤ 18Y, (n = 390)

Normal

87 (82.9%)

65 (44.8%)

34 (60.7%)

13 (15.5%)

89.387, 0.000

0.415, 0.000

 

Abnormal

18 (17.1%)

80 (55.2%)

22 (39.3%)

71 (84.5%)

  

19-30Y, (n = 950)

Normal

258 (80.6%)

127 (44.6%)

76 (53.1%)

38 (18.8%)

200.669, 0.000

0.427, 0.000

 

Abnormal

62 (19.4%)

158 (55.4%)

67 (46.9%)

164 (81.2%)

  

 > 30Y, (n = 420)

Normal

124 (81.0%)

33 (33.7%)

37 (67.3%)

15 (13.2%)

137.888, 0.000

0.492, 0.000

 

Abnormal

29 (19.0%)

65 (66.3%)

18 (32.7%)

99 (86.8%)

  

Total, (n = 1760)

Normal

469 (81.1%)

225 (42.6%)

147 (57.9%)

66 (16.5%)

420.342, 0.000

0.440, 0.000

 

Abnormal

109 (18.9%)

303 (54.7%)

107 (42.1%)

334 (83.5%)

  
  1. The constituent ratio was obtained from Pearson Chi-Square test analysis, and the correlation coefficient was obtained from Spearman test. p significance was set at < 0.05