Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (n = 175)

From: Factors in oral-related quality of life of betel quid users receiving oral mucosal screening: a cross‑sectional study in Taiwan

Variable

Number (%)

Sex

 

 Male

173 (98.9)

 Female

2 (1.1)

Marital status

 

 Living alone

107 (61.1)

 Living with a partner

68 (38.9)

Educational level

 

 Literacy

3 (1.7)

 Elementary

17 (9.7)

 Junior high

41 (23.4)

 Senior high

86 (49.1)

 College and above

28 (16.0)

Type of occupation

 

 Unemployed

17 (9.7)

 Unskilled/ semi-skilled worker

15 (8.6)

 Skilled worker

66 (37.7)

 Clerk, shop owner, farm owner

35 (20.0)

 Semi-professional

22 (12.6)

 Professional

8 (4.6)

 Other

12 (6.8)

Religion

 

 None

48 (27.4)

 Buddhism/Taoism

115 (65.7)

 Christianity/Catholicism

10 (5.7)

 Other

2 (1.2)

Annual family income (NT$)

 

 < 500,000

91 (52.0)

 ≥ 500,000

84 (48.0)

Smoking

 

 Nil/ex-smoker

37 (21.1)

 Current smoker

138 (78.9)

Drinking

 

 Nil/ex-drinker

53 (30.3)

 Current drinker

122 (69.7)

Time since chewing betel nut

 

 < 10 years, < 20 amount/day

34 (19.4)

 < 10 years, > 20 amount/day

29 (16.6)

 > 10 years, < 20 amount/day

55 (31.4)

 > 10 years, > 20 amount/day

57 (32.6)

Motivation for oral mucosal screening

 

 Active screening

31 (17.7)

 Family members advice

19 (10.9)

 Doctor referral

125 (71.4)

Clinical presentation

 

 Normal

156 (89.1)

 Suspected oral cavity cancer

9 (5.1)

 Unknown oral mass

1 (0.6)

 Erythroplakia (red)

2 (1.1)

 Erythroleukoplakia (red and white)

1 (0.6)

 Thick homogeneous leukoplakia

3 (1.7)

 Thin homogeneous leukoplakia

1 (0.6)

 Oral ulcer

2 (1.1)

  1. SD standard deviation, NT New Taiwan Dollars