Skip to main content

Table 1 Composition of the materials used in the study

From: The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)

Manufacturer

Composition

Classification

Material

3 M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA

Organic: 20 wt.% resin matrix (Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA, TEGDMA)

Fillers: SiO2 (20 nm), ZrO2 (4–11 nm), ZrO2/SiO2 nanoclusters (0.6–10 nm)

Filler content: 80 wt.% nanoceramic

Resin nano ceramic

Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM blocks

GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan

Organic:29 wt.% resin matrix (UDMA, DMA, Bis-MEPP)

Fillers: barium glass (300 nm),

SiO2 (20 nm)

Filler content: 71 wt.% nanoparticles

Flexible nano ceramic

Cerasmart

CAD/CAM blocks

Ultradent; South Jordan, UT, USA

Hydrofluoric acid 9% buffered

Hydrofluoric acid gel

Ultradent

Porcelain Etch

Renfert GmbH, Hilzingen, Germany

99.5% Al2O3 (50 μm), SiO2 < 0.06%

Grit blasting particles

Cobra 50-μm Al2O3 powder

  1. Abbreviations: UDMA urethane dimethacrylate, Bis-GMA bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate, Bis-EMA bisphenol A-ethyl methacrylate; TEGDMA triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, Bis-MEPP bismethacryloxyethoxydiphenylpropane, DMA dimethacrylate