Skip to main content

Table 3 Attractiveness scores mean and significance of profession and role of associated structures (NLC, L) by Chinese raters (n = 281) and Black raters (n = 280)

From: Effect of the ethnic, profession, gender, and social background on the perception of upper dental midline deviations in smile esthetics by Chinese and Black raters

Deviation

NLC scores for Chinese raters

L scores for Chinese raters

p-value

(mm)

Orthodontists (n = 56) mean ± SD

G. Practitioners (n = 56) mean ± SD

Dental students (n = 56) mean ± SD

Art students (n = 57) mean ± SD

Layperson (n = 56) mean ± SD

Orthodontists (n = 56) mean ± SD

G.Practitioners (n = 56) mean ± SD

Dental students (n = 56) mean ± SD

Art students (n = 57) mean ± SD

Layperson (n = 56) mean ± SD

Across profession

NLC x L Results*

0

2.2 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 0.8

2.0 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

2.1 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.8

n.s

n.s

1

2.6 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 1.0

2.0 ± 0.7

2.3 ± 0.9

2.0 ± 0.9

2.6 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 1.0

2.0 ± 0.7

2.3 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.9

* NLC + L

n.s

2

2.6 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.7

1.9 ± 0.8

2.1 ± 0.4

2.1 ± 0.9

2.6 ± 1.0

2.3 ± 0.8

2.0 ± 0.8

2.0 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.8

* NLC + L

n.s

3

2.6 ± 1.1

2.5 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.7

2.6 ± 1.0

2.2 ± 0.9

2.9 ± 1.1

2.1 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 1.2

1.9 ± 0.7

* NLC + L

n.s

4

3.3 ± 0.8

2.7 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 1.0

2.2 ± 0.9

3.2 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.9

2.7 ± 0.9

2.8 ± 1.6

2.3 ± 0.8

* NLC + L

n.s

5

3.1 ± 0.9

2.9 ± 0.8

2.7 ± 0.8

2.6 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.8

3.2 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 1.0

2.7 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 1.0

* NLC + L

*

Deviation

NLC scores for Black raters

L scores for Black raters

p-value

(mm)

Orthodontists (n = 56) mean ± SD

G. Practitioners (n = 56) mean ± SD

Dental students (n = 56) mean ± SD

Art students (n = 56) mean ± SD

Laypersons (n = 56) mean ± SD

Orthodontists (n = 56) mean ± SD

G. Practitioners (n = 56) mean ± SD

Dental students (n = 56) mean ± SD

Art students (n = 56) mean ± SD

Laypersons (n = 56) mean ± SD

Across profession

NLC x L Results*

0

2.3 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 1.5

2.2 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

1.9 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 0.8

2.1 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.9

n.s

*

1

2.6 ± 0.7

2.1 ± 1.0

2.5 ± 0.8

2.1 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.8

2.7 ± 1.0

1.5 ± 0.7

2.5 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.9

2.0 ± 0.8

* NLC + L

*

2

2.7 ± 0.8

2.3 ± 0.8

2.6 ± 1.2

2.3 ± 0.6

2.2 ± 1.1

2.6 ± 1.0

2.0 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 1.1

2.6 ± 0.9

2.1 ± 1.0

* NLC + L

n.s

3

2.8 ± 0.7

2.3 ± 0.8

3.0 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

2.8 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 0.8

2.9 ± 0.9

2.1 ± 1.4

2.3 ± 1.0

* NLC + L

n.s

4

3.2 ± 0.8

2.9 ± 0.9

3.1 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 1.1

3.4 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.9

3.5 ± 0.9

2.0 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 1.0

* NLC + L

*

5

3.4 ± 0.8

2.8 ± 0.9

3.5 ± 1.4

2.3 ± 0.8

2.3 ± 1.0

3.4 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 0.9

3.8 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 0.8

* NLC + L

n.s

  1. A higher score implies a less attractive smile
  2. *Mean it is significant (P < 0.05); n.s not significant in both NLC and L