Skip to main content

Table 4 Attractiveness scores mean and significance of gender and age by Chinese raters (n = 281) and Black raters (n = 280)

From: Effect of the ethnic, profession, gender, and social background on the perception of upper dental midline deviations in smile esthetics by Chinese and Black raters

Deviation

NLC scores for Chinese raters

L scores for Chinese raters

p-value

(mm)

Male (n = 158) mean ± SD

Female (n = 123) mean ± SD

18–30 year (n = 219) mean ± SD

31–51 year (n = 62) mean ± SD

Male (n = 158) mean ± SD

Female (n = 123) mean ± SD

18–30 year (n = 219) mean ± SD

31–51 year (n = 62) mean ± SD

Across gender

Across age

0

2.2 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.8

2.3 ± 0.8

2.0 ± 0.8

2.1 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

2.1 ± 0.9

n.s

n.s

1

2.3 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 1.0

2.1 ± 1.0

2.3 ± 1.1

2.2 ± 1.1

2.3 ± 0.9

n.s

n.s

2

2.3 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 1.0

2.2 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 1.0

n.s

n.s

3

2.5 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 0.9

2.6 ± 1.1

2.3 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 1.0

2.3 ± 0.9

2.6 ± 1.2

n.s

n.s

4

2.5 ± 0.9

2.7 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.9

3.1 ± 1.0

2.6 ± 1.0

2.7 ± 1.2

2.6 ± 1.1

3.0 ± 1.1

n.s

*NLC + L

5

2.6 ± 0.9

2.8 ± 0.8

2.6 ± 0.8

3.0 ± 1.0

2.6 ± 1.0

2.7 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.9

3.0 ± 1.0

* NLC

*NLC + L

Deviation

NLC scores for Black raters

L scores for Black raters

p-value

(mm)

Male (n = 158) mean ± SD

Female (n = 123) mean ± SD

18–30 year (n = 206) mean ± SD

31–51 year (n = 74) mean ± SD

Male (n = 158) mean ± SD

Female (n = 123) mean ± SD

18–30 year (n = 206) mean ± SD

31–51 year (n = 74) mean ± SD

Across gender

Across age

0

2.3 ± 1.1

2.3 ± 0.8

2.3 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 0.9

2.2 ± 0.9

2.1 ± 1.0

2.1 ± 0.9

2.3 ± 0.8

n.s

n.s

1

2.3 ± 0.8

2.3 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.9

2.1 ± 1.0

2.1 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 1.0

n.s

* L

2

2.6 ± 1.0

2.3 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 0.9

2.4 ± 1.1

2.3 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 0.9

* NLC

n.s

3

2.7 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.8

2.6 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 1.3

2.5 ± 1.1

2.6 ± 0.8

* NLC

n.s

4

2.8 ± 0.6

2.8 ± 1.1

2.8 ± 1.0

3.0 ± 0.9

2.9 ± 1.1

2.6 ± 1.1

2.6 ± 1.1

2.8 ± 1.0

n.s

n.s

5

2.9 ± 1.1

2.8 ± 1.1

2.8 ± 1.2

3.1 ± 0.9

2.9 ± 0.9

3.0 ± 1.1

2.9 ± 1.0

3.0 ± 1.0

n.s

* NLC

  1. A higher score implies a less attractive smile
  2. *Mean it’s significant (P < 0.05); n.s not significant in both NLC and L