Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of main findings by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)

From: The efficacy of mouthwashes on oral microorganisms and gingivitis in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Type of MW

Certainty assessment

Effect

 

Number of studies

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

Absolute (95% CI) OR qualitative assessment

Certainty

CHX

MW

Cariogenic bacteria—

MW vs placebos

4 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

Colony count of MS was significantly reduced compared to placebos according to three studies [34, 48, 52]

Colony count of MS was slightly reduced compared to placebo in a short time (significantly at 15 min) [40]

Very low

 

Cariogenic bacteria—

MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

very seriousd

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of MS was significantly reduced compared to blank control according to one study [53]

Colony count of MS was significantly reduced compared to baseline according to one study [51]

Very low

 

Total bacteria—

MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of total bacteria were significantly reduced compared to placebos according to two studies [34, 43]

Very low

 

GI—MW vs placebos

3 RCT (≤ 3 month)

not serious

seriousf

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

WMD 0.45 lower (0.70 lower to 0.20 lower) [20, 32, 56]

Low

 

GI—MW vs blank controls

6 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousg

seriousf

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

WMD 0.54 lower (0.96 lower to 0.13 lower) [35, 39, 49, 53, 55, 58]

Very low

 

PI—MW vs placebos

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousg

not serious

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

PI was significantly reduced compared to placebos according to two studies [20, 32]

Very low

 

PI—MW vs blank controls

4 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousf

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

WMD 0.7 lower (1.12 lower to 0.27 lower) [35, 49, 53, 55]

Very low

 

PD—MW vs placebos

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

not serious

not serious

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

PD was significantly reduced except mid-lingual site compared to placebo [32]. The changes of PD were significantly higher compared to placebo [56]

Low

Herbal

MW

Cariogenic bacteria—

MW vs placebos

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

very seriousd

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of MS was significantly reduced compared to placebo [52]. Colony count of MS was slightly reduced compared to placebo in a short time (significantly at 1 and 15 min) [40]

Very low

 

Cariogenic bacteria—

MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of MS was significantly reduced compared to baseline [48]. Colony count of MS was insignificantly reduced compared to baseline [51]

Very low

 

GI—MW vs blank controls

3 RCT (≤ 3 month)

not serious

not serious

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

WMD 0.2 lower (0.32 lower to 0.09 lower) [35, 39, 58]

Moderate

 

Plaque related index—

MW vs placebos

3 RCT (≤ 3 month)

not serious

serioush

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

PI’ was significantly reduced compared to placebo [56]

VPI was significantly reduced compared to placebo [41]

PI was insignificantly reduced compared to placebo [19]

Low

 

Plaque related index—

MW vs blank controls

8 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

serioush

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

PI’ was significantly reduced compared to baseline [39]

PI’’ was significantly reduced compared to baseline [48]

PI’’ was significantly reduced compared to baseline [54]

PI’’’ was significantly reduced compared to baseline [58]

BBI was significantly reduced compared to baseline [40]

BBPI was significantly reduced compared to blank control [47]

TI was significantly reduced compared to baseline [45]

The amount of dental plaque was significantly reduced compared to baseline [38]

Very low

 

Gingival inflammation related index—MW vs placebos

3 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousg

seriousi

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

GBI was significantly reduced compared to placebo [41]

GBI’ was significantly reduced compared to placebo [56]

BI was significantly reduced compared to placebo [40]

Very low

 

Gingival inflammation related index—MW vs blank controls

3 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousi

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

CPI was significantly reduced compared to baseline [35]

SBI was significantly reduced, while MGI was similar compared to baseline [45]

BOP was significantly reduced compared to blank control [39]

Very low

Fluoride

MW

Cariogenic bacteria—MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of MS was significantly reduced compared to baseline according to two studies [33, 34]

Very low

 

Cariogenic bacteria—MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≥ 12 month)

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of MS was similar to blank control according to two studies [37, 59]

Very low

 

Cariogenic bacteria—MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≥ 12 month)

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of LB was similar to blank control according to two studies [37, 59]

Very low

 

Plaque related index—

MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

serioush

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

TI was significantly reduced compared to baseline [34]. PI was significantly reduced compared to baseline, while similar with blank control [46]

Very low

 

Plaque related index—

MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≥ 12 month)

seriousa

serioush

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

PI was similar to blank control [37]

API was slightly reduced compared to blank control (significant at 6 and 9 months) [59]

Very low

 

Gingival inflammation related index—MW vs blank controls

2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousi

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

MGI’ and BI’ was significantly reduced compared to baseline [34]. BOP and GI was slightly lower compared to blank control [46]

Very low

CPC

MW

Plaque related index—

MW vs blank controls

3 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

serioush

not serious

seriousc

publication bias undetected

BBPI was significantly reduced compared to blank control [47]

PI was significantly reduced compared to blank control [50]

The amount of dental plaque was significantly reduced compared to baseline [38]

Very low

Probiotic

MW

Cariogenic bacteria—MW vs blank controls 2 RCT (≤ 3 month)

seriousa

seriousb

not serious

very seriouse

publication bias undetected

Colony count of MS was significantly reduced compared to blank control [53]. Colony count of MS was insignificantly increased compared to baseline [33]

Very low

  1. The results reported in two or more studies are included in the table
  2. Abbreviations: CHX Chlorhexidine, CPC Cetylpyridinium chloride, MW Mouthwash, RCT Randomized controlled trial, CI Confidence interval, WMD Weighted mean difference, GI Gingival index by Löe and Silness 1963, PD Pocket probing depth, PI Plaque index by Silness and Löe 1964, MS Mutans streptococci, PI’ Plaque index by O’leary’s 1972, VPI Visible plaque index, PI’’ Plaque index (Unspecified), PI’’’ Plaque index by William 1991, BBI Bonded bracket index, BBPI Bonded bracket plaque index, TI Quigley-Hein plaque index, GBI, Gingival bleeding index by Ainamo J 1975, GBI’ Gingival bleeding index by Carter and Barnes 1974, BI Bleeding index (Unspecified), CPI Community periodontal index, SBI Sulcus bleeding index, BOP Bleeding on probing, MGI Modified gingival index (Unspecified), LB Lactobacilli, API Approximal plaque index, MGI’ Modified gingival index by Lobene 1986, BI’ Bleeding index by Saxton and van der Ouderaa 1989
  3. a. The proportion of information from studies at high risk of bias is sufficient to affect the interpretation of results and to lower confidence in the estimate of effect
  4. b. Lack of uniform units
  5. c. Sample sizes that are less than 400
  6. d. The proportion of information from studies at high risk of bias is sufficient to affect the interpretation of results and to substantially lower confidence in the estimate of effect
  7. e. The effect estimate came from only one or two studies with small sample sizes
  8. f. Minimal overlap of CI and I2 > 50%
  9. g. Most information is from studies at unclear risk of bias, and it is likely to lower confidence in the estimate of effect
  10. h. Adopt different plaque-related indexes
  11. i. Adopt different gingival inflammation-related indexes