Table 4 Summary of modified Jadad score used for quality judgment
From: Airway dimensional changes following bone anchored maxillary protraction: a systematic review
Questions | Miranda et al., 2021 | Beville et al., 2012 | Nguyen et al., 2015 | Seo et al., 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Was the study described as randomized? |  + 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Yes | No | |||||
 + 1 | 0 | |||||
Was the method of randomization appropriate? |  + 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Yes | Not described | No | ||||
 + 1 | 0 | -1 | ||||
Was the study described as blinded? |  + 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Double | Single | No | ||||
+ 1 | 0.5 | 0 | ||||
Was method of blinding appropriate? |  + 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Yes | Not described | No | ||||
+ 1  | 0 | -1 | ||||
Was there description of withdrawals or dropouts? |  + 1 |  + 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Yes | No | |||||
+ 1 | 0 | |||||
Was there a clear description of inclusion/ exclusion criteria? |  + 1 | 0 |  + 1 |  + 1 | ||
Yes | No | |||||
+ 1 | 0 | |||||
Was the method to assess adverse effects described? |  + 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Yes | No | |||||
 + 1 | 0 | |||||
Was the method of statistical analysis described?  |  + 1 |  + 1 |  + 1 |  + 1 | ||
Yes | No | |||||
+ 1 | 0 | |||||
Total | Â | 7.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Quality description | Â | High quality | Low quality | Low quality | Low quality | |