Skip to main content

Table 2 TMJ side-related space dimensions of the BSSO and Control group assessed by CBCT

From: Modeling the effect of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy on posterior, superior and medial space dimensions of the temporomandibular joint: a retrospective controlled cohort study

TMJ space

T0

T1

T1 – T0

P*

T2

T2 – T1

P*

T2—T0

P*

Right side

 Posterior space

  BSSO group (n = 36)

2.9 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 0.7

-0.6 ± 1.1

0.004

2.1 ± 0.7

-0.2 ± 0.9

0.165

-0.8 ± 0.9

< 0.001

  Control group (n = 25)

2.8 ± 0.8

2.2 ± 0.4

-0.5 ± 0.9

0.004

2.4 ± 0.9

0.2 ± 0.9

0.266

-0.3 ± 1.0

0.098

 Superior space

  BSSO group (n = 36)

3.6 ± 0.1

3.4 ± 0.8

-0.2 ± 1.1§

0.263

3.5 ± 0.7

0.1 ± 0.9

0.415

-0.1 ± 0.9

0.556

  Control group (n = 25)

3.5 ± 0.9

4.1 ± 1.1

0.6 ± 1.6§

0.093

3.9 ± 0.7

-0.2 ± 1.5

0.496

-0.3 ± 0.9

0.076

 Medial space

  BSSO group (n = 36)

2.3 ± 0.7

3.2 ± 0.9

0.9 ± 1.0§

 < 0.001

2.2 ± 0.7

-1.0 ± 0.8

 < 0.001

-0.07 ± 0.7

0.562

  Control group (n = 25)

2.6 ± 0.7

2.8 ± 0.8

-0.2 ± 0.6§

0.136

2.6 ± 0.7

0.2 ± 0.6

0.192

-0.0 ± 0.1

0.435

Left side

 Posterior space

  BSSO group (n = 36)

3.0 ± 1.0

2.3 ± 0.7

-0.7 ± 1.2

 < 0.001

2.0 ± 0.5

-0.3 ± 0.8

0.026

-1.0 ± 1.0§

< 0.001

  Control group (n = 25)

2.8 ± 1.1

2.4 ± 0.6

-0.3 ± 1.0

0.121

2.6 ± 0.1

0.1 ± 1.1

0.520

-0.2 ± 1.2§

0.464

 Superior space

  BSSO group (n = 36)

3.4 ± 1.0

3.6 ± 0.6

0.2 ± 1.1

0.260

3.1 ± 0.8

-0.5 ± 0.9

< 0.001

-0.4 ± 1.0

0.032

  Control group (n = 25)

3.6 ± 0.9

4.4 ± 1.4

0.8 ± 1.7

0.024

3.8 ± 0.6

-0.5 ± 1.6

0.104

-0.3 ± 1.0

0.158

 Medial space

  BSSO group (n = 36)

2.4 ± 0.9

3.5 ± 1.2

1.0 ± 0.9

 < 0.001

2.3 ± 0.7

-1.2 ± 1.0

< 0.001

-0.2 ± 0.5

0.051

  Control group (n = 25)

2.6 ± 0.8

2.8 ± 0.6

0.2 ± 0.5

0.072

2.7 ± 0.8

-0.2 ± 0.5

0.140

0.1 ± 0.1

0.086

  1. TMJ Temporomandibular joint, CBCT Cone-beam computed tomography, BSSO Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, T0 Before surgery, T1 Immediately after surgery, T2 Mean follow-up at 12.1 ± 2.8 month after surgery, P: Probability of type I error
  2. * Paired sample t-test
  3. § Significant difference with independent t-test