Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes of narrow implants

From: Influence of implant diameter on implant survival rate and clinical outcomes in the posterior area: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No

Author

n. Narrow implants

Narrow diameter

Implant Survival Rate (Narrow)

Prosthesis Success Rate (Narrow)

MBL (Narrow)

BoP (Narrow) % sites

PPD (Narrow)

1

Alrabiah et al

53

3.3

/

/

1.4 ± 0.2

35.1 ± 6.4

3.3 ± 0.6

2

de Souza et al

22

3.3

100 (22/22) – > 1 year 95 (19/20) – > 3 years

95.45 (21/22) – > 1 year

90 (18/20) – > 3 years

0.49 ± 0.27

– > 1 year 0.58 ± 0.39

– > 3 years

/

/

3

Pieri et al

113

3.0

98.2 (111/113)

97.95 (48/49)

0.95 ± 0.84

/

/

4

Al-Shibani et al

47 (22D + 25ND)

3.3

/

/

0.15 (0.1–0.4)

21.3 (12.4–26.7)

2.4 (2.1–3.3)

5

Garlini et al

4

3.25

100 (4/4)

/

/

/

/

6

Mangano et al

5

3.3

100 (5/5)

100 (5/5)

/

/

/

7

Romeo et al

75

3.3

98.6 (74/75)

/

0.5 ± 0.3 – > load 1.5 ± 1.3 – > 7 years

/

2.3 ± 1.0 – > load 2.4 ± 1.1 – > 7 years

  1. MBL mean bone loss, BoP bleeding on probing, PPD pocket probing depth