Skip to main content

Table 3 Outcomes of regular implants

From: Influence of implant diameter on implant survival rate and clinical outcomes in the posterior area: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No

Author

n. Regular implants

Regular diameter

Implant Survival Rate (Regular)

Prosthesis Success Rate (Regular)

MBL (Regular)

BoP (Regular) % sites

PPD (Regular)

1

Alrabiah et al

47

4.0

/

/

1.7 ± 0.5

31.6 ± 8.8

3.2 ± 1.8

2

de Souza et al

22

4.1

100 (22/22) – > 1 year 100 (20/20) – > 3 years

100 (22/22) – > 1 year 95 (19/20) – > 3 years

0.42 ± 0.24 – > 1 year 0.53 ± 0.46 – > 3 years

/

/

3

Pieri et al

126

4.0 (77) 4.5 (49)

96.8 (122/126)

96.5 (56/58)

1.2 ± 0.86

/

/

4

Al-Shibani et al

39 (20D + 19ND)

4.1

/

/

0.2 (0.1–0.4)

18.7 (14.8–21.4)

2.4 (2.0–3.1)

5

Garlini et al

111

3.75

98.1 (109/111)

/

/

/

/

6

Mangano et al

96

4.1

97.91 (94/96)

98.9 (93/94)

/

/

/

7

Romeo et al

179

4.1

98.3 (176/179)

/

0.6 ± 0.2 – > load 1.6 ± 1.1 – > 7 years

/

2.4 ± 0.9 – > load 2.5 ± 1.2 – > 7 years

  1. MBL mean bone loss, BoP bleeding on probing, PPD pocket probing depth