Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of articles according to SURGE criteria: title, abstract, introduction, and methods

From: Quality of survey-based study reports in dentistry

Section

Description of the criterion

Categories

n

Title and abstract

It states the word ‘questionnaire’ or ‘survey’ in the title and/or abstract.

1. In title and abstract

19

2. In title or abstract

78

3. No

2

Introduction

There is an explanation of why the research is necessary.

1. Yes

99

2. No

0

It indicates the purpose or objective

1. Yes

99

2. No

0

Methods

It describes the questionnaire/provides access to the items in the questionnaire

1. Questionnaire provided

45

Research instrument

2. Central questions provided

26

3. A complete question provided

0

4. Questions not provided

28

If an existing instrument was used, its psychometric properties were mentioned: confidence and validity

1. Yes

18

2. No

32

3. Not applicable

49

If an existing instrument was used, references to the original study are provided.

1. Yes

47

2. No

3

3. Not applicable

49

In a new instrument, the procedures used to develop it and/or the methods used for the pretest are mentioned.

1. Yes

26

2. No

23

3. Not applicable

50

In a new instrument, its validity and confidence were reported.

1. Both

4

2. Only confidence

7

3. Only validity

2

4. None

36

5. Not applicable

50

It describes the scoring procedures

1. Yes

77

2. No

6

3. Not applicable

16

Sample selection

It describes the study population and sampling frame.

1. Both

46

2. Study population

28

3. Sampling frame

1

4. None

24

It describes the representativeness of the sample.

1. Yes

87

2. No

12

It presents a sample size calculation or justification of it.

1. Yes

81

2. No

18

Survey administration

The mode of administration of the survey to participants is specified.

1. In person

75

2. Mail

6

3. Mixed

5

4. Not mentioned

13

Type and number of contacts

1. Type and number

33

2. Only type

53

3. No information

13

Financial or other incentives to study participants.

1. Yes

6

2. No

93

Description of who approached potential participants.

1. Yes

38

2. No

61

Analysis

It describes the method of data analysis.

1. Adequate (complete)

91

2. Inadequate (incomplete)

4

3. Does not describe

4

It mentions the methods for nonresponse error analysis.

1. Yes

0

2. No

99

It mentions the method for calculating the response rate.

1. Yes

0

2. No

99

It mentions definitions for complete versus partial endings.

1. Yes

37

2. No

62

It mentions methods for handling missing item data.

1. Yes

5

2. No

94