Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of model performance across different patient groups

From: Influence of growth structures and fixed appliances on automated cephalometric landmark recognition with a customized convolutional neural network

 

I. No fixed orthodontic appliances

II. Orthodontic brackets and/or bands and other fixed orthodontic appliances

I/1

Permanent Dentition

I/2

Mixed Dentition

T-Test

Between Groups I/1 and I/2

II

Permanent Dentition

T-Test

Between Groups I/1 and II

N

141

164

 

135

 
 

MRE (mm)

SD (mm)

MRE (mm)

SD (mm)

p value

MRE (mm)

SD (mm)

p value

A-Point

1.21

0.71

1.31

0.76

0.25

1.31

0.84

0.30

Ap-Superior

1.90

1.21

2.15

1.52

0.12

1.72

1.07

0.19

Ap-Inferior

1.72

1.12

2.32

1.63

 < 0.01

1.61

0.97

0.35

ANS

1.72

1.14

1.77

1.76

0.78

1.66

1.31

0.66

Art

1.24

1.00

1.25

0.72

0.93

1.20

0.79

0.72

B-Point

1.24

0.60

1.25

0.70

0.90

1.27

0.74

0.77

Ba

1.66

1.15

1.69

1.19

0.83

1.53

1.01

0.32

Me

1.37

0.89

1.46

0.92

0.40

1.25

0.95

0.28

Is-Superior

0.86

0.50

1.20

1.15

 < 0.01

0.88

0.44

0.64

Is-Inferior

1.14

0.71

1.24

1.22

0.39

1.18

0.73

0.64

N

1.16

0.67

1.32

0.92

0.07

1.12

0.64

0.60

Pog

1.63

1.13

1.80

1.44

0.25

1.52

0.96

0.35

PNS

1.68

1.27

1.71

1.45

0.87

1.59

1.10

0.54

S

1.01

0.64

0.93

0.63

0.31

0.89

0.53

0.10

T1

1.71

1.29

1.60

1.20

0.45

1.54

1.14

0.27

T2

1.68

1.09

1.75

1.23

0.57

1.64

1.12

0.77

AVERAGE

1.43

0.95

1.55

1.15

 

1.37

0.90

Â