Studies | Whole tooth/ root (N) | Approach | DT Mean mm (SD) | Measuring Position | Direction of DZ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harris et al. [52] | Whole tooth (22) | Using the imaging software, the entire mesial root was sectioned from the root apex coronally in 0.5-mm increments for the first 6 mm and in 1.0-mm increments from the 6-mm point to the level of the furcation. The first 6 mm of the distal root was also sectioned in 0.5-mm increments coronally from the apex | DZ in MR = 1.28 mm DZ in DR ranged from 0.25 mm (at the 0.5-mm level from the apex) To 1.47 mm (at the 5.0-mm level) |  | toward furcation |
Lee et al. [54] | MR (37) | 3D surface models were re-sliced at 0.1-mm intervals perpendicular to the central axis through the whole length of the canal | 1.16 (± 0.37) 1.00 (± 0.28) 1.86 (± 0.60) Thinnest dentine = 0.88 (± 0.26) | Mesially Distally Laterally (buccal and lingual) | MB (65%) disto-inside, and (35%) mesially ML (72%) disto-inside, and (28%) mesially |
Keles & Keskin [24] | MR 30 bifid and 30 non-bifid | 3D map of dentine thickness was obtained and colour-coded. The DZ was measured at each 1 mm slice from 1 to 7 mm level apical to the furcation | bifid = 1.16 ± 0.16 bifid = 1.08 ± 0.18 non bifid = 1.18 ± 0.15 non bifid = 1.12 ± 0.18 | Mesially Distally Mesially Distally | In the mesial direction, it was ranged from 0.49 to 1.88 mm (bifid roots) and from 0.43 to 1.85 mm (non-bifid roots), in the distal direction it varied from 0.32 to 2.14 mm (bifid roots) and from 0.40 to 1.92 mm (non-bifid roots) |
De-Deus et al. [11] | MR (28) | 3D models of root surfaces and canals were created and the central axis obtained. DZ was estimated on re-sliced planes made perpendicular to the central axis of each canal at 0.1 mm for the whole length | DZ = 0.86 (± 0.15) |  | 60.7% and 71.4% are located distally in group *I and *II respectively 39.2% and 28.6% are located mesially in group *I and *II respectively |