Acceptability of fully guided virtual implant planning software among dental undergraduate students

BMC Oral Health

Table 2 Consistency of the Subscales in relation to responses

Subscales	N	Mean	SD	Min	Max	Percentiles			Cronbach’s Alpha
Subscales	N	Mean	SD	Min	Max	Q1	Median	Q3	Cronbach’s Alpha
Perceived Usefulness	66	33.39	5.78	6	36	31.75	36	36	0.97
Perceived Ease of Use	66	32.61	5.13	12	36	30	36	36	0.92
Perceived Behavioral Control	66	26.85	4.35	15	30	25	30	30	0.89
Subjective Norm	66	32.24	5.94	12	36	30	36	36	0.96
Attitude	66	14.36	2.68	10	17	12	14	17	0.67
Behavioral Intention	66	11.30	1.44	7	12	11.75	12	12	0.61

Spearman’s correlations were significant for all the constructs (Table 3). Only selected pairs of independent and dependent variables deemed relevant were included in Table 3. Perceived Ease of Use explained 49%, 33%, and 42% of the variance of Perceived Usefulness (R² = 0.49), Attitude (R² = 0.33), and Perceived Behavioral Control (R² = 0.42) respectively. Perceived Usefulness explained 25%, 18%, and 23% of the variance of Attitude (R² = 0.25), Behavioral Intention (R² = 0.18), and Perceived Behavioral Control (R² = 0.23) respectively. Attitude accounted for 25%, 33%, and 29% of the variance of Behavioral Intention (R² = 0.25), Perceived Behavioral Control (R = 0.33), and Subjective Norm (R = 0.29) respectively (Figs. 2, 3 and 4).

ISSN: 1472-6831