Accuracy of digital workflow for placing orthodontic miniscrews using generic and licensed open systems. A 3d imaging analysis of non-native .stl files for guided protocols

Table 2 Inferential statistics of the angular differences between planned and achieved miniscrews insertion

Groups	Side	N	Mean	SD	Significance	Mean Diff.	SE Diff.	95% Interval Coefficient
Groups	Side	N	Mean	SD	Significance	Mean Diff.	SE Diff.	Lower Limit	Upper Limit
Group 1	Right	10	7.15	1.09	0.44*	0.41	0.52	-0.68	1.50
Group 2	Right	10	6.74	1.23	0.44*	0.41	0.52	-0.68	1.50
Group 1	Left	10	6.19	0.80	0.32*	0.40	0.39	-0.43	1.23
Group 2	Left	10	5.79	0.95	0.32*	0.40	0.39	-0.43	1.23
Group 1	Right	10	7.15	1.09	0.002**	0.962	0.427	0.06414	1.85986
Group 1	Left	10	6.19	0.80	0.002**	0.962	0.427	0.06414	1.85986
Group 2	Right	10	6.74	1.23	0.019**	0.954	0.491	0.0783	1.98639
Group 2	Left	10	5.79	0.95	0.019**	0.954	0.491	0.0783	1.98639

*P value set at p < 0.05 and based on Independent Student t test. P < 0.05 = statistically significant
**P value set at p < 0.05 and based on paired Student t test. P < 0.05 = statistically significant
Group 1 = BluSkyPlan software; Group 2 = Dolphin software; N = number; SD = Standard Deviation;
Mean Diff. = difference between means; SE diff. = standard error of the difference

ISSN: 1472-6831