Skip to main content

Table 1 The comparison of the coronal distance deviations between two surgery approaches (Group SG vs. FH)

From: Accuracy assessment of implant placement with versus without a CAD/CAM surgical guide by novices versus specialists via the digital registration method: an in vitro randomized crossover study

Group

SG

FH

Statistical method

Difference

95% CI

P

n

Mean ± SD (mm)

n

Mean ± SD (mm)

SA

30

0.61 ± 0.29

30

1.00 ± 0.56

paired-samples T test

-0.39

-0.62 ~ -0.17

0.001**

SB

30

0.67 ± 0.40

30

1.10 ± 0.48

-0.43

-0.67 ~ -0.19

0.001**

S

60

0.64 ± 0.35

60

1.05 ± 0.52

-0.41

-0.57 ~ -0.25

< 0.001***

IA

5

0.48 ± 0.16

5

0.64 ± 0.13

Wilcoxon test

-0.16

/

0.080

IB

5

0.56 ± 0.45

5

0.56 ± 0.30

0.00

/

0.893

I

10

0.52 ± 0.32

10

0.60 ± 0.22

-0.08

/

0.285

  1. **p < 0.01
  2. ***p < 0.001