Skip to main content

Table 3 The Comparison of angular deviations between two surgery approaches (Group SG vs. FH)

From: Accuracy assessment of implant placement with versus without a CAD/CAM surgical guide by novices versus specialists via the digital registration method: an in vitro randomized crossover study

Group

SG

FH

Statistical method

Difference

95% CI

P

n

Mean ± SD (°)

n

Mean ± SD (°)

SA

30

2.74 ± 1.55

30

6.79 ± 2.89

paired-samples T test

-4.05

-5.32 ~ -2.79

< 0.001***

SB

30

3.05 ± 1.81

30

4.38 ± 1.73

-1.33

-2.35 ~ -0.31

0.012*

S

60

2.89 ± 1.68

60

5.58 ± 2.66

-2.69

-3.56 ~ -1.83

< 0.001***

IA

5

3.11 ± 1.45

5

2.55 ± 1.33

Wilcoxon test

0.56

/

0.500

IB

5

1.66 ± 1.22

5

2.32 ± 1.09

-0.66

/

0.345

I

10

2.38 ± 1.48

10

2.44 ± 1.15

-0.06

/

0.959

  1. *p < 0.05
  2. ***p < 0.001