Table 1 The manufacturers’ compositional information and experimentally determined filler weight% of the materials investigated [29]
From: The effect of water storage on nanoindentation creep of various CAD-CAM composite blocks
Material (Code) | Manufacturer | Composition by weight represented by the manufacturers | Filler weight% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymer | Filler | ||||
Polymer- infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) | Vita Enamic (EN) | Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany | 14% UDMA, TEGDMA | 86% fine structure feldspar ceramic | 85.1(0.1) |
Resin-composite blocks (RCB) | Grandio Blocs (GR) | VOCO GmbH, Germany | 14% UDMA, DMA | 86% nanohybrid fillers | 84.6(0.01) |
Lavaâ„¢ Ultimate (LU) | 3Â Mâ„¢ESPEâ„¢, USA | 20% Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA,TEGDMA | 80% silica and zirconia nano particles | 74.8(0.1) | |
BRILLIANT Crios (BC) | COLTENE, Switzerland | Cross-linked methacrylates (Bis-GMA, Bis-EMA, TEGDMA) | 70% of glass and amorphous silica | 70.1(0.05) | |
Cerasmart (CS) | GC dental products, Europe | Bis-MEPP, UDMA, DMA | 71% silica and barium glass nanoparticles | 66.1(0.2) | |
Block HC (HC) | Shofu, Japan | UDMA, TEGDMA | 61% silica powder, microfumed silica, and zirconium silicate | 63(0.02) | |
Ceramic-filled PEEK | Dentokeep (DK) | NT-Trading, Germany | 80% PEEK | 20% TiO2 | 27.5(0.06) |