Skip to main content

Table 2 Nanoindentation creep (µm) of CAD-CAM composite blocks at 24 h dry storage at 23 ˚C and at three month water storage at 37 ˚C, compared to previously investigated bulk compressive creep [8], and nanohardness and elastic modulus at 24 h dry storage at 23 ˚C previously investigated [29]

From: The effect of water storage on nanoindentation creep of various CAD-CAM composite blocks

Material (Code)

Nanoindentation creep in µm (SD)

Nanohardness in GPa (SD)

Elastic Modulus in GPa (SD)

Bulk compressive creep % (SD)

24 h dry

3 months water storage

24 h dry

24 h dry

24 h dry

3 months water storage

Polymer- infiltrated ceramic network (PICN)

Vita Enamic (EN)

0.09 (0.015)A,1

0.28 (0.009)A,2

3.1 (0.17)A

34.56 (1.4)A

0.45 (0.07)A,1

0.71 (0.1)A,2

Resin-composite blocks (RCB)

Grandio Blocs (GR)

0.32 (0.01)B,1

1.1 (0.1)B, E, 2

1.3 (0.08)B

14.8 (0.4)B

0.50 (0.12)A,B,1

0.91 (0.06)A,2

Lavaâ„¢ Ultimate (LU)

0.33 (0.03)B,1

0.44 (0.02)A,D,2

1.25 (0.05)B

12.14 (0.76)B

0.76 (0.08)B,1

1.13 (0.15)A,2

BRILLIANT Crios (BC)

0.31 (0.009)B,1

0.79 (0.24)B, D, ,2

0.85 (0.008)C

10.98 (0.6)C,D

0.55 (0.06)A,B 1

1.42 (0.26)B,C 2

Cerasmart (CS)

0.27 (0.006)B,1

0.87 (0.09)B, D, F, 2

0.81 (0.006)C

10.36 (0.17)C,D,E

0.99 (0.04)C, D 1

1.74 (0.19)B,2

Block HC (HC)

0.29 (0.03)B,1

1.3 (0.2)E, F, 2

0.775 (0.031)C

8.79 (0.35)C,D, E

1.09 (0.09)D,1

1.85 (0.09)B,2

Ceramic-filled PEEK

Dentokeep (DK)

0.31 (0.03)B,1

3.46 (0.2)C,2

0.34 (0.03)D

3.43 (0.29)D,E

NA

NA

  1. Values with the same superscript letters represent non-significant differences among different materials (Bonferroni post hoc tests (α = 0.05)). Values with the same numbers represent non-significant differences among the storage conditions for each material (Independent sample t-test)