Skip to main content

Table 2 Measurements’ differences of the maximum dimension of IAC (MD), vertical distance (VD), and horizontal position (HP) relationship compared for different anatomical sites

From: Identification of the inferior alveolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography vs. panoramic radiography: a retrospective comparative study

 

P1

(Mean ± SD)

P2

(Mean ± SD)

M1

(Mean ± SD)

M2

(Mean ± SD)

M3

(Mean ± SD)

p-value

MD

2.99 ± 1.0

3.34 ± 0.78a

3.50 ± 0.96ab

3.79 ± 1.06b

4.43 ± 1.25ab

0.000**

VD

9.23 ± 1.84

8.34 ± 1.72 cb

7.69 ± 1.85a

7.87 ± 1.88a

9.29 ± 2.56c

0.000**

HP

%(count)

%(count)

%(count)

%(count)

%(count)

 

M

40.0 (2)

69.6 (55)

37.0 (68)

15.9 (30)

28.9 (56)

0.000**

B

0.0 (0)

0.0 (0)

1.00 (2)

0.5 (1)

1.00 (2)

 

L

60.0 (3)

30.4 (24)

62.0 (114)

83.6 (158)

70.1 (136)

 
  1. Data were retrieved from CBCT coronal views (CCV)
  2. Kruskal–Wallis test (different letters within a row indicate a significant difference at the level of 5%)
  3. Fisher's exact test
  4. **Statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). P1-2: 1st and 2nd premolar sites, M1-3: 1st, 2nd, 3rd molars sites, M: middle, B: buccal, L: lingual