Skip to main content

Table 3 Level of the evidence by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)

From: Stem cell-based therapy in periodontal regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies

 

Certainty assessment

Effect

Outcomes

Number of studies (participants)

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

Absolute (95% CI)

Certainty

CAL

8 (195)

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

publication bias undetected

MD 1.18 lower (1.55 lower to 0.8 lower)

High

PPD

9 (236)

not serious

seriousa

not serious

not serious

publication bias undetected

MD 0.75 lower (1.35 lower to 0.14 lower)

Moderate

REC

8 (216)

not serious

not serious

not serious

seriousb

publication bias undetected

MD 0.23 lower (0.54 lower to 0.08 higher)

Moderate

CEJ-BD

5 (161)

not serious

not serious

not serious

seriousb

publication bias undetected

MD 0.57 lower (1.14 lower to 0.01 higher)

Moderate

BC-BD

4 (96)

not serious

not serious

not serious

seriousb

publication bias undetected

MD 0.95 lower (1.67 lower to 0.23 lower)

Moderate

  1. CAL: clinical attachment levels; PPD: probing pocket depth; REC: recession of the gingival margin; CEJ-BD: linear distance from cementoenamel junction to bottom of defect; BC-BD: linear distance from bone crest to bottom of defect; athe confidence interval overlapped less, the P value of the heterogeneity test was very small, and the I2 was larger; bfunnel graph asymmetry