Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?

Original Submission
24 Jan 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yongchao Gou
Resubmission - Version 3
18 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yongchao Gou
Resubmission - Version 4
19 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yongchao Gou
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Yongchao Gou
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
29 Jun 2023 Editorially accepted
8 Jul 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12903-023-03188-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page