Skip to main content

Table 3 Methodological quality assessment

From: Relationship between bruxism and mandibular bone modifications based on medical imaging: a scoping review

Studies

Calculation of the required number subjects

Bruxism diagnosis [1]

Assessment method of outcome

Several evaluators

Blinding assessment of outcome

Patients selection bias

Padmaja Satheeswarakumar et al., 2018 [21]

No

Probable

Moderate risk of bias

Yes

Not specified

No

Türp et al., 2021 [22]

No

Probable

Moderate risk of bias

Yes

Not specified

Yes

Isman, 2021 [23]

Yes

Possible

Moderate risk of bias

Yes

Yes

No

Eninanc et al., 2021 [24]

Yes

Probable

Moderate risk of bias

No

No

No

Eninanc et al., 2021 [26]

Yes

Probable

Moderate risk of bias

No

No

No

Gulec et al., 2021 [25]

Yes

Probable

Moderate risk of bias

Yes

Yes

No

Yilmaz et al., 2022 [27]

Yes

Probable

Moderate risk of bias

Yes

Yes

No

Serafim et al., 2022 [28]

Yes

Probable

Low risk of bias

No

Yes

No

Casazza et al., 2023 [29]

Yes

Probable

Moderate risk of bias

Yes

Yes

No