Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between sectional and circumferential matrices used in restoration of proximal contact and contour

From: Impact of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness and surface geometry in class II direct composite restoration in-vitro

Parameter

Sectional Matrix

Circumferential Matrix

Mean Difference (95%CI)

P value

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Contact tightness (N)

4.22 ± 0.90

3.03 ± 0.39

1.19 (0.52–1.86)

0.002

Area of concavity (mm 2 )

0.03 ± 0.03

0.16 ± 0.06

−0.13 (−0.18 − −0.08)

< 0.001

Depth of concavity (mm)

0.05 ± 0.04

0.11 ± 0.03

−0.06 (−0.09 − −0.03)

0.001

Radius of curvature (mm)

9.48 ± 4.48

5.80 ± 2.24

3.69 (0.27–7.10)

0.036