AUTHOR | STUDY DESIGN | SAMPLE | CHAIN | LINKS | MANUFACTURER | DISTANCE BETWEEN PINS | TIME | TYPE OF MOUTHWASH/AGENT | CONTROL GROUP | MOUTHWASH APPLICATION | RESULTS | QUALITY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al – Ani [13] | In vitro | 72 | short | - | M | 29 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7d, 21d | Listerine®- Zero (without alcohol) Listerine® Original (26,9% alcohol) | Distilled water | 60 seg / 12 h | All groups with alcohol showed an increase in strength loss compared to the non-alcoholic and distilled water control group (p < 0.05). | MEDIUM |
Menon et al. [11] | In vitro | 840 | short | 3 | OO | 23,5 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Listerine®; Colgate Phos Flur®, Clorhex Plus®; 26,9% alcohol; 0.04% NaF; Clorhexidine 0,2% | Artificial saliva | 60 seg / 12 h | At 24 h, the greatest loss of strength (49.48%) was observed in the 26.9% Alcohol group in the short elastomeric chains. The best result was obtained by 0.2% chlorhexidine with a loss of 46.7% (p < 0.5) | LOW |
Behnaz et al. [17] | In vitro | 160 | short | 6 | AO | 25 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Listerine® Total Care Zero Listerine® Healthy White | Artificial saliva | 30 seg / 12 h | At 24 h the greatest loss of decomposition of the elastomeric chains was produced in all the groups. In the control group, the loss of strength was 42.18%, while in daily mouth rinses with whitening agents it was 48.34% (Listerine ® Total Care Zero) and 53.38% (Listerine ® Healthy White) respectively (p < 0.05) | LOW |
Nahidh et al. [20] | In vitro | 440 | short | - | OT | 29 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Listerine® green tea. (Camellia Sinensis Green tea; NaF) Tebodont (Melaleuca Alternifolia, tea tree oil) Aloe - dent (aloe vera, peppermint oil, mentol, Melaleuca Alternifolia) Herba Silca (Milenrama, chamomile, calendula, salvia) | Distilled water | 60 seg / 12 h | They found the greatest degradation of strength in the control group at 24 h of 52%. There were no statistically significant differences with the herbal rinses (p < 0.05) | LOW |
Ramachandraiah et al. [19] | In vitro | 180 | corta | 3 | 3 M; OP; OO | 18 mm (P). 22 mm (SP). | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Listerine®; Wokadine; Alcohol 21,6%; Alcohol 8,38% | Artificial saliva | 60 seg / 12 h | In all groups, including the control group, the greatest loss of strength was obtained at 24 h in the group of elastomeric chains without pre-stretching compared to the pre-stretched chains that obtained better results. | LOW |
Mirhashemi et al. [4] | In vitro | 315 | Sin enlace | - | AO | 24 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Persica; Clorhexidine 0,2% Sodium Fluorure 0,2%; CLX + Sodium Fluorure | Artificial saliva | 60 seg / 12 h | A loss of strength was observed with statistically significant results for all groups (p < 0.001). The greatest strength degradation occurred at 24 h in the CLX + NaF group. | MEDIUM |
Sadeghian et al. [14] | In vitro | 90 | short | 5 | AO; D | 25 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Sodium Fluorure 0,05%; Listerine® | Artificial saliva | 60 seg / 24 h | The results showed that the effect of the commercial house on the strength of the elastomeric chains was statistically significant and that the average strength of the AO chains was higher than that of the Dentaurum house (p = 0.001). Both NaF and Listerine ® intensified the loss of strength of the elastomeric chains (p < 0.001) | LOW |
Javanmardi and Salehi [3] | In vitro | 80 | short | 5 | OT | 15 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Orthokin®; Sensikin®; Persica | Artificial saliva | 60 seg / 12 h | The highest percentage of strength degradation was in the Persica group. The Orthokin® mouthwash was the one that obtained the best results compared to the other groups, including the control group. | LOW |
Omidkhoda et al. [16] | In vitro | 120 | short/ closed | 5/7 | D | 25 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Clorhexidine 0,2%; Persica Sodio Fluorure 0,05% | Artificial saliva | 60 seg / 24 h | Chlorhexidine caused the greatest loss of strength at 24 h (27.24% in closed connectors) followed by NaF and artificial saliva. Persica obtained the best results. | LOW |
Oshagh et al. [18] | In vitro | - | closed | 4 | OT | 25 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Sodium Fluorure 0,0% Clorhexidine 0,2%; Té | Distilled water | 60 seg / 24 h | The greatest loss of strength was observed at 24 h in all groups, but there were no statistically significant differences in terms of strength degradation with the different mouthwashes (p < 0.05). | LOW |
Kumar et al. [12] | In vitro | 480 | short | 4 | 3 M | 25 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Coca-Cola; Listerine® Tea | Distilled water | 60 seg / 12 h | Tea caused the greatest degradation of strength followed by the Listerine ® and Coca-Cola group compared to the control group with statistically significant results (p < 0.01) | LOW |
Pithon et al. [15] | In vitro | 90 | short | 5 | M | 23,5 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Clorhexidine 0,12%; Clorhexidine 0,2% Periogard® 0,12%; Cleanform® | Distilled water | 30 seg / 12 h | Chlorhexidine did not show a statistically significant influence on the pattern of degradation of the strength of the elastomeric chains (p < 0.05). | LOW |
Pithon et al. [7] | In vitro | 108 | short | 5 | M | 23,5 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Plax; Listerine® Plax Whitening; Listerine® Whitening | Distilled water | 60 seg / 12 h | All groups obtained the greatest loss of strength at 24 h. After 28 days, the greatest loss of strength occurred in the control group (artificial saliva). The presence of bleaching agent had no relevance in the results obtained. | LOW |
Larrabee et al. [8] | In vitro | 450 | short | 3 | RMO | 23,5 mm | 0 h, 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28 d. | Alcohol 14%; Alcohol 26,9% Cepacol® (alcohol 14%); Listerine® (alcohol 26,9%) | Distilled water | 60 seg / 12 h | Cepacol® mouthwash obtained 54.2% loss of strength at 24 h compared to 53% for Listerine®. All alcohol groups caused an increase in the disintegration force of the elastomeric chains with time. | LOW |