STUDY | Study design | Clearly stated aims | Sample size calculation | Well defined control group | Operator details and blinding | Number links used | Distance between pins | Right statistical analysis | QUALITY RESULTS (%) | RISK OF BIAS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al – Ani [13] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 64,2% | MEDIUM |
Menon et al. [11] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 92,8% | LOW |
Behnaz et al. [17] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | LOW |
Nahidh et al. [20] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 71,4% | LOW |
Ramachandraiah et al. [19] | In vitro | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 78,57% | LOW |
Mirhashemi et al. [4] | In vitro | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 64,2% | MEDIUM |
Sadeghian et al. [14] | In vitro | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 78,57% | LOW |
Javanmardi and Salehi [3] | In vitro | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 85,7% | LOW |
Omidkhoda et al. [16] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 85,7% | LOW |
Oshagh et al. [18] | In vitro | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 71,4% | LOW |
Kumar et al. [12] | In vitro | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 92,8% | LOW |
Pithon et al. [15] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 85,7% | LOW |
Pithon et al. [7] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | LOW |
Larrabee et al. [8] | In vitro | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | LOW |