Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison between the three studied groups according to ocular complications, wound healing, sensory nerve function and scar

From: Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: finding the least complicated surgical approach (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

 

Group A

(n = 8)

Group B

(n = 8)

Group C

(n = 8)

χ2

P

 

No

%

No

%

No

%

Ocular complications

 No

5

62.5

6

75.0

7

87.5

1.358

MCp = 0.836

 Yes

3

37.5

2

25.0

1

12.5

Sig. bet. grps

FEp1 = 1.0,FEp2 = 0.569,FEp3 = 1.0

  

Wound healing

 Normal

6

75.0

8

100

7

87.5

4.721

MCp = 0.302

 Distrubed (Infection)

2

25.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

 Wound dehiscence

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

12.5

Sig. bet. grps

FEp1 = 0.467,MCp2 = 0.469,FEp3 = 1.0

  

Sensory nerve function

 Not affected

6

75.0

8

100

7

87.5

2.092

MCp = 0.747

 Affected (Numbnes)

2

25.0

0

0.0

1

12.5

Sig. bet. grps

FEp1 = 0.467,FEp2 = 1.000,FEp3 = 1.0

  

Scar

 No

0

0.0

8

100

8

100

23.289*

MCp < 0.001*

 Yes

8

100

0

0.0

0

0.0

Sig. bet. grps

FEp1 < 0.001*,FEp2 < 0.001*,p3 = _

  
  1. χ2 Chi square test, FE Fisher Exact, MC Monte Carlo
  2. p: p value for comparing between the three studied groups
  3. p1: p value for comparing between group A and group B
  4. p2: p value for comparing between group A and group C
  5. p3: p value for comparing between group B and group C
  6. *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05