Skip to main content

Table 3 Randomized trials reporting alveolar ridge preservation

From: Efficacy of concentrated growth factor (CGF) in the surgical treatment of oral diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (year)

Study Design, Blinded (duration)

Population

Intervention (number of surgical sites)

No. of participants (sites)

Age (mean/range)

gender

Control (sites)

Test (sites)

Lin et al. (2021) [60]

Parallel, N (8 months)

36 (36)

48 (34–65)

21 M/15F

natural healing (12)

T1: BO + collagen membrane (12); T2: BO + CGF + CGF membrane (12)

Ma et al. (2021) [45]

Parallel, examiner-blinded (3 months)

46 (46)

43.98 ± 13.8 (23–72)

28 M/18F

natural healing (23)

CGF + CGF membrane (23)

Keranmu et al. (2022) [58]

Parallel, N (6 months)

38 (38)

28.89 ± 2.7 (N)

15 M/23F

BO + collagen membrane (19)

BO + CGF + CGF membrane + collagen membrane (19)

Liu et al. (2022) [61]

Parallel, N (6months)

22 (24)

30.46 ± 10.58 (19–61)

11 M/11F

BO + collagen membrane (12)

BO + CGF membrane (12)

Elayah et al. (2023) [51]

Split-mouth, examiner-blinded (3 months)

30 (60)

25 ± 0.5 (19–35)

16 M/14F

natural healing (30)

CGF (30)