Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the types of developmental dental anomalies in the study and control groups in all subjects, females, and males, compared to children without anomalies

From: Is there an association between molar incisor hypomineralization and developmental dental anomalies? A case-control study

 

Dental anomalies

MIH

n (%)

Control

n (%)

Odds Ratio

95% Confidence Interval

p

Total

Size anomalies

3 (5.5)

0

n.a.*

Positional anomalies

8 (14.5)

6 (12.8)

0.72

0.25–2.09

0.545

Shape anomalies

12 (21.8)

5 (10.6)

0.40

0.14–1.15

0.088

Number anomalies

32 (58.2)

36 (76.6)

1.08

0.66–1.77

0.765

Total

55 (100)

47 (100)

 

Female

Size anomalies

2 (7.1)

0

n.a.*

Positional anomalies

3 (10.7)

5 (16.7)

1.80

0.42–7.62

0.427

Shape anomalies

8 (28.6)

2 (10)

0.27

0.06–1.29

0.100

Number anomalies

15 (53.6)

13 (65)

0.93

0.43–2.01

0.862

Total

28 (100)

20 (100)

 

Male

Size anomalies

1 (3.7)

0

n.a.*

Positional anomalies

5 (18.5)

1 (3.7)

0.17

0.02–1.46

0.106

Shape anomalies

4 (14.8)

3 (11.1)

0.63

0.14–2.86

0.552

Number anomalies

17 (63)

23 (85.2)

1.14

0.59–2.20

0.687

Total

27 (100)

27 (100)

 
  1. n: number, MIH: Molar incisor hypomineralization, Multiple Logistic Regression, *not applicable due to small sample size