Assessing the impact of occlusal plane rotation on facial aesthetics in orthodontic treatment: a machine learning approach

Table 5 Predicted correlation between FHR and SN-OP in different skeletal types

		Hypo	Nor	Hyper	Total
Class I	k	− 0.28 ± 0.03	− 0.28 ± 0.04	− 0.28 ± 0.04	− 0.28 ± 0.03
Class I	b	73.07 ± 2.11	70.14 ± 1.69^a	66.97 ± 2.8^b,c	70.36 ± 3.22
Class II	k	− 0.27 ± 0.04	−0.28 ± 0.04	− 0.29 ± 0.04^b	− 0.28 ± 0.04
Class II	b	72.97 ± 1.28	70.12 ± 1.96^a	67.74 ± 2.82^b,c	70.82 ± 2.3
Class III	k	−0.26 ± 0.03	−0.28 ± 0.03^a	− 0.27 ± 0.04	−0.27 ± 0.03
Class III	b	72.61 ± 2.52	70.73 ± 2.33^a	66.97 ± 1.68^b,c	70.71 ± 3.27
Total	k	−0.27 ± 0.03	−0.28 ± 0.04	− 0.28 ± 0.04
Total	b	73.02 ± 2.06	70.56 ± 1.78	67.64 ± 2.4
Inter-group comparison	k	N.S	N.S	N.S
Inter-group comparison	b	N.S	N.S	N.S

*Intra-group comparison: “a”: significant differences between Hypo- and Nor-group; “b”: significant differences between Hypo- and Hyper-group; “c”: significant differences between Nor- and Hyper-group

ISSN: 1472-6831