Assessing the impact of occlusal plane rotation on facial aesthetics in orthodontic treatment: a machine learning approach

Table 6 Predicted correlation between FA and SN-OP in different skeletal types

		Hypo	Nor	Hyper	Total
Class I	k	−0.4 ± 0.07	−0.31 ± 0.09^a	− 0.25 ± 0.09^b,c	− 0.33 ± 0.1
Class I	b	95.47 ± 2.25	94.21 ± 2.5	91.45 ± 3.27^b,c	93.92 ± 3.08
Class II	k	−0.37 ± 0.06	−0.32 ± 0.07^a	− 0.23 ± 0.08^b,c	−0.31 ± 0.09
Class II	b	94.42 ± 2.44	93.14 ± 2.57	90.63 ± 3.5^b,c	92.9 ± 3.15
Class III	k	−0.47 ± 0.07	−0.41 ± 0.08	− 0.34 ± 0.09^b,c	−0.41 ± 0.1
Class III	b	96.78 ± 2.14	96.07 ± 2.3	94.72 ± 2.41^b	96.13 ± 2.27
Total	k	−0.41 ± 0.08	−0.34 ± 0.09	− 0.27 ± 0.1
Total	b	95.52 ± 2.47	94.41 ± 2.71	92.18 ± 3.6
Inter-group comparison	k	B,C	B,C	B,C
Inter-group comparison	b	C	B,C	B,C

*Intra-group comparison: “a”: significant differences between Hypo- and Nor-group; “b”: significant differences between Hypo- and Hyper-group; “c”: significant differences between Nor- and Hyper-group
*Inter-group comparison: “A”: significant differences between Class I and II group; “B”: significant differences between Class I and III group; “C”: significant differences between Class II and III group

ISSN: 1472-6831