Table 4 Association of Aesthetic properties at different months within groups

Surface Luster T 1 MONTH

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

 Luster comparable to enamel

12

85.7

11

78.6

13

92.9

36

85.7

χ2=1.167 p=0.558

 Slightly dull, not noticeable from a speaking distance

2

14.3

3

21.4

1

7.1

6

14.3

 No surface staining

13

92.9

12

85.7

14

100

39

92.9

χ2=2.154 p=0.341

 Minor staining, easily removable

1

7.1

2

14.3

0

0

3

7.1

 Good color match. No difference in shade and translucency

14

100

12

85.7

14

100

40

95.2

χ2=4.200 p=0.122

 Minor deviations

0

0

2

14.3

0

0

2

4.8

 Form is ideal

14

100

14

100

14

100

42

100

-

 Luster comparable to enamel

12

85.7

10

71.4

13

92.9

35

83.3

χ2=2.400 p=0.301

 Slightly dull, not noticeable from speaking distance

2

14.3

4

28.6

1

7.1

7

16.7

 No surface staining

13

92.9

12

85.7

14

100

39

92.9

χ2=2.154 p=0.341

 Minor staining, easily removable

1

7.1

2

14.3

0

0

3

7.1

 Good color match. No difference in shade and translucency

14

100

11

78.6

14

100

39

92.9

χ2=6.462 p=0.040

 Minor deviations

0

0

3

21.4

0

0

3

7.1

 Form is ideal

14

100

14

100

14

100

42

100

-

 Luster comparable to enamel

12

85.7

10

71.4

13

92.9

35

83.3

χ2=2.400 p=0.301

 Slightly dull, not noticeable from a speaking distance

2

14.3

4

28.6

1

7.1

7

16.7

 No surface staining

13

92.9

12

85.7

14

100

39

92.9

χ2=2.154 p=0.341

 Minor staining, easily removable

1

7.1

2

14.3

0

0

3

7.1

 Good color match. No difference in shade and translucency

14

100

11

78.6

14

100

39

92.9

χ2=6.462 p=0.040

 Minor deviations

0

0

3

21.4

0

0

3

7.1

 Form is ideal

14

100

14

100

14

100

42

100

-

Total

14

100

14

100

14

100

42

100