Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparisons of pre-post data in EXG group

From: Cephalometric and digital model analysis of dentoskeletal effects of infrazygomatic miniscrew vs. Essix- anchored Carriere Motion appliance for distalization of maxillary buccal segment: a randomized clinical trial

Characteristic

Pre

Post

Difference

95% CI

 

p-value

Cohen’s d

Lower bound

Upper bound

SNA (°)

81.4 ± 3.2

80.9 ± 3

-0.5 ± 0.7

-0.9

-0.1

.012

0.710

SNB (°)

75.4 ± 2.6

76.3 ± 2.6

0.9 ± 0.5

0.6

1.1

 < .001

1.756

ANB (°)

5.9 ± 1.5

4.6 ± 1.3

-1.3 ± 1.1

-1.9

-0.7

 < .001

1.156

LAFH (mm)

62.3 ± 6.5

63.4 ± 6.4

1.1 ± 0.8

0.7

1.6

 < .001

1.344

PFH (mm)

67.5 ± 6

68.9 ± 5.9

1.4 ± 0.9

0.9

1.9

 < .001

1.510

U1-SN (°)

100.6 ± 6.3

99.3 ± 6

-1.4 ± 0.8

-1.8

-0.9

 < .001

1.630

U3 ANGLE (°)

90.5 ± 5.6

85.1 ± 5

-5.4 ± 3.7

-7.3

-3.4

 < .001

1.478

U6 ANGLE (°)

69.7 ± 3.1

61.6 ± 3

-8.1 ± 2.7

-9.6

-6.7

 < .001

3.030

L6 ANGLE (°)

58.7 ± 5.2

53.5 ± 5.5

-5.2 ± 3.4

-7.1

-3.3

 < .001

1.512

IMPA (°)

97.6 ± 5.4

101.2 ± 5.4

3.5 ± 1.3

2.8

4.2

 < .001

2.632

IIA (°)

125.3 ± 9.6

121.4 ± 10.4

-3.9 ± 2.8

-5.4

-2.4

 < .001

1.370

U3 VP (mm)

64.4 ± 4.7

67.4 ± 4.4

3 ± 2

2

4.1

 < .001

1.523

U6 VP (mm)

60 ± 4.5

61.2 ± 4.7

1.2 ± 0.9

0.7

1.7

 < .001

1.341

L6m VP (mm)

63.8 ± 4.7

62.3 ± 4.9

-1.6 ± 0.8

-2

-1.2

 < .001

1.987

L6d VP (mm)

61.5 ± 4.7

60.2 ± 4.9

-1.3 ± 0.9

-1.7

-0.8

 < .001

1.361

L6 AP (mm)

35.5 ± 4.6

37.2 ± 4.6

1.6 ± 1.2

1

2.3

 < .001

1.309

Model measurements

 MV- U3

37 ± 8

40.8 ± 8

3.8 ± 1

3.2

4.4

 < .001

3.635

 MV- U6

30 ± 5.4

37.8 ± 7.3

7.7 ± 3.2

6

9.5

 < .001

2.397

 MH- U3

10.7 ± 1.9

8.4 ± 2

-2.3 ± 0.7

-2.7

-2

 < .001

3.497

 MH- U6

13.9 ± 1.5

16.1 ± 1.5

2.2 ± 0.8

1.8

2.6

 < .001

2.804

 ICW

33.6 ± 3

35.9 ± 3.3

2..3 ± 0.7

1.9

2.7

 < .001

3.227

 IMW

45.4 ± 2.8

45.3 ± 3

-0.1 ± 0.9

-0.5

0.3

.565

0.147

 OJ

4.7 ± 1.4

3.3 ± 1.2

-1.4 ± 0.9

-1.8

-0.9

 < .001

1.622

 OB

3.7 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 1.1

-1.3 ± 0.9

-1.8

-0.8

 < .001

1.393

  1. Data is expressed as mean ± SD. The test of significance is Paired-Samples t-test. Effect size is presented as Cohen’s d (effect size is considered as small, medium, and large if Cohen’s d = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively)