Skip to main content

Table 1 Materials used in the study, their brand names, compositions, manufacturers, and lot numbers

From: The effect of repair protocols and chewing simulation on the microtensile bond strength of two resin matrix ceramics to composite resin

Material

Brand name

Composition

Manufacturer

Lot number

Polymer infiltrated ceramic

VITA Enamic

Polymeric matrix 14 wt% (UDMA, TEGDMA)

Fillers 86 wt%: SiO2 (58–63%), Al2O3

(20–23%), Na2O (9–11%), K2O

(4–6%), B2O3 & ZrO2 (< 2%). CAD/CAM block size (12 × 14 × 18 mm).

Vita Zahnfabrik,

Bad Säckingen, Germany

55,313

Resin nanoceramic

Lava Ultimate

Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA,

TEGDMA, SiO2 (20 nm), ZrO2

(4–11 nm), ZrO2/SiO2 clusters,

filler mass (80 wt%). CAD/CAM block size (12 × 14 × 18 mm).

3 M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA

N770935

Universal adhesive

Single bond

10 Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate, HEMA,

silane, dimethacrylate resins, Vitrebond, copolymer,

filler, ethanol, water, initiators

3 M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA

5,695,133

Nanohybrid composite resin

Brilliant NG

Methacrylates, dented glass, and amorphous silica, with filler content of 80 wt%

Coltene, Altstätten, Switzerland

162,456

Hydrofluoric acid

etchant

Porcelain etchant

9.5% buffered hydrofluoric acid gel

Bisco, Irving Park Rd. Schaumburg, IL, USA

2,000,001,191

Silane coupling agent

Porcelain primer pre-hydrolyzed silane primer

γ-methacryloxy-propyl-trimethoxy silane, ethanol, acetone

Bisco, Irving Park Rd. Schaumburg, IL, USA

2,000,001,245