Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of the quality assessment for cases series

From: Oral findings and comprehensive dental management of Moebius syndrome: a systematic review

No.

Authors

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Overall Score and Quality

19

De Serpa Pinto et al.,[15]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

20

Magalhães et al., [16]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

21

Cai et al., [25]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

22

Hassib et al., [34]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

23

Magnifico et al., [36]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100

  1. Question (Q); N/A, not applicable; Y, yes; N, no; U, unclear
  2. Q1: Were there clear criteria for inclusion in the case series?
  3. Q2: Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants included in the case series?
  4. Q3: Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition for all participants included in the case series?
  5. Q4: Did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants?
  6. Q5: Did the case series have consecutive inclusion of participants?
  7. Q6: Was there clear reporting of the demographics of the participants in the study?
  8. Q7: Was there reporting of clinical information of the participants?
  9. Q8: Were the outcomes or follow-up results of cases clearly reported?
  10. Q9: Was there clear reporting of the presenting sites(s)/clinics(s) demographic information?
  11. Q10: Was statistical analysis appropriate?
Back to article page

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us