Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Relationship between sublingual varices and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

N

Author, date

Country

Sample size case/control

Mean Age

Sex (%F) case/control

Hypertension frequency in case/control

Normotensive frequency in case/control

1

Accardo et al. (2021) [1]

Italy

724/284

45–85

59.4/57

518/227

206/57

2

Akkaya et al. (2019) [21]

Turkey

186/505

NR

67.2/683

63/23

123/482

3

Bergh et al. (2022) [33]

Sweden

326/663

Case: 68.8 ± 7.3

Control:65.3 ± 7.2

48.5/57.5

136/179

190/484

4

Hedström et al. (2015) [48]

Sweden

114/317

55.3 ± 10.9

56.4

57/63

57/254

5

Baharvand et al. (2022) [37]

Iran

91/60

47.58 ± 12.19

49

33/4

58/56

6

Jafari et al. (2022) [6]

Iran

271/207

74.5

50.2/67.6

103/74

168/133

7

Shivakumar et al. (2020) [17]

India

65/136

52.3 ± 11.5

52.3/33.8

45/30

20/106

8

González-Álvarez et al. (2022) [20]

Spain

162/336

NR

70.4/69.9

50/52

112/284

9

İçöz et al. (2021) [49]

Turkey

155

38.8

60.6

22/35

133/431

10

Olufemi et al. (2016) [50]

Nigeria

31/169

51.6 ± 0.9

44.5/44.5

28/72

3/97

11

Jamali et al. (2023) [38]

Iran

109/391

Case: 43.3 ± 11.3

Control:42.7 ± 12.2

45/56

84/58

25/333

12

Lazos et al. (2020) [2]

Argentina

309/363

18–92 (median = 37.7)

61.8/58.6

46/4

263/359

  1. NR Not Reported