Evaluation of the amount of residual monomer released from different flowable composite resins

BMC Oral Health

Table 3 Distribution of TEGDMA, Bis-GMA and UDMA data by light source mode

Materials	TEGDMA			Bis-GMA			UDMA
Materials	Standard	Extra	p	Standard	Extra	p	Standard	Extra	p
Grandio flow	61,77 ± 16,45a	342,52 ± 49,24A	< 0,001	100,38 ± 44,90a	568,12 ± 83,54A	< 0,001	15,22 ± 29,14a	59,97 ± 23,17A	< 0,001
Nova Compo HF	12,86 ± 6,97b	239,64 ± 48,08B	< 0,001	15,44 ± 7,84b	233,38 ± 77,69B	< 0,001	25,72 ± 13,72b	410,23 ± 129,90B	< 0,001
SDR® Flow	58,78 ± 37,04a	195,79 ± 130,93B	< 0,001	4,66 ± 2,09c	10,57 ± 5,28C	< 0,001	8,30 ± 14,94c	24,16 ± 45,43C	0,738
p	< 0,001	< 0,001		< 0,001	< 0,001		< 0,001	< 0,001

Different letters (a, b, c) indicate the statistical difference in residual monomer release between materials in standard mode in each column
Different letters (A, B, C) indicate the statistical difference in residual monomer release between materials in extra power mode in each column

ISSN: 1472-6831