Skip to main content

Table 1 The questions of the DISCERN instrument with the mean (standard deviation) score of each question

From: Quality assessment of available Internet information on early orthodontic treatment

Each question is rated accordingly:

Orthodontists

Multidisciplinary dental clinics

Professional organizations

Total

 

1

2

3

4

5

No

 

Partially

 

Yes

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Section 1 (Questions 1–8): The reliability of the publication

1. Are the aims clear?

2.28 (0.48)

2.62 (0.65)

3.70 (1.06)

4.00 (0.82)

2. Does it achieve its aims?

2.19 (0.49)

2.38 (0.51)

3.70 (1.06)

4.00 (0.82)

3. Is it relevant?

2.13 (0.38)

2.46 (0.66)

3.70 (1.06)

4.00 (0.82)

4. Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication (other than author/ producer)?

2.10 (0.79)

1.69 (0.48)

2.90 (1.45)

4.00 (2.00)

5. Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced?

1.00 (0.00)

1.00 (0.00)

2.70 (1.64)

5.00 (0.00)

6. Is it balanced or unbiased?

3.78 (0.59)

3.69 (0.63)

3.50 (1.27)

3.50 (1.91)

7. Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information?

1.04 (0.36)

1.00 (0.00)

3.00 (1.63)

3.75 (1.89)

8. Does it refer to areas of uncertainty?

1.29 (0.57)

1.46 (0.66)

2.90 (1.45)

3.25 (0.96)

Section 2 (Questions 9–15): The quality of the information on treatment choices

9. Does it describe how each treatment works?

1.31 (0.53)

1.54 (0.66)

3.30 (1.16)

2.75 (1.50)

10. Does it describe the benefits of each treatment?

1.94 (0.38)

1.92 (0.87)

3.50 (0.85)

2.00 (1.15)

11. Does it describe the risks of each treatment?

1.03 (0.17)

1.15 (0.53)

2.70 (1.16)

2.00 (1.15)

12. Does it describe what would happen if no treatment is used?

2.62 (0.60)

2.23 (0.73)

1.30 (0.67)

2.50 (1.29)

13. Does it describe how treatment choices affect the overall quality of life?

1.07 (0.26)

1.31 (0.48)

3.50 (0.71)

2.50 (1.73)

14. Is it clear that there may be more than one possible choice of treatment?

1.14 (0.55)

1.62 (0.87)

3.60 (1.35)

3.00 (1.41)

15. Does it provide support for shared decision-making?

2.10 (0.42)

2.31 (0.63)

3.10 (1.29)

3.00 (0.82)

Section 3 (Question 16): Overall quality rating of the publication

16. This question is rated accordingly:

    
 

1

2

3

4

5

2.16 (0.41)

2.31 (0.48)

3.20 (0.92)

3.50 (0.58)

 

Low

Serious or extensive shortcomings

 

Moderate

Potentially important but no serious shortcomings

 

High

Minimal shortcomings